Current:Home > NewsSouth Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech -Infinite Profit Zone
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
SafeX Pro Exchange View
Date:2025-04-09 07:40:54
SEOUL, Dec 12 - South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol's switch from contrition to defiance on Thursday (Dec 11) over his martial law order rallied some supporters but other members of his party said it did nothing to sway their view that he must be removed from office.
In a speech before a second impeachment vote scheduled for Saturday, Yoon condemned his political opponents as "anti-state forces" that side with enemies in North Korea, said Pyongyang may have hacked the South's elections and defended last week's short-lived martial law order as a legal move to protect democracy.
The remarks hit many of the talking points featuring on conservative YouTube channels and marked a sharp change of tone from a speech before the first impeachment vote last week in which he apologised and said he would place his political future in the hands of his People Power Party.
It was unclear what caused the change but Yoon gave no sign of supporting a proposal by PPP leader Han Dong-hoon for him to resign in coming months and to hand authority to the prime minister and ruling party until then.
The speech brought to the fore divisions in the PPP. Changing tack, Han urged party members to vote for impeachment on Saturday, a move greeted by shouting from pro-Yoon lawmakers, who voted in Kweon Seong-dong as their new party floor leader shortly after Yoon's speech.
[[nid:712402]]
Kweon, a Yoon supporter, said the party's position was still to oppose the president's impeachment but that a meeting would be held before Saturday's vote to finalise plans.
The party boycotted the last vote, preventing a quorum. At least 200 votes are needed to impeach Yoon. Opposition parties have 192 seats, so they need at least eight PPP members to join.
As of Thursday, at least seven members of the party were expected to support a new impeachment motion.
One PPP lawmaker who said he would now vote to impeach Yoon said the president's new remarks may have rallied some loyalists but sowed more confusion and division among conservatives.
[[nid:712337]]
"His speech had an impact on the election of the floor leader. Also, it sounds like he urged those who blindly follow the president among conservatives to take action," PPP lawmaker Kim Sang-wook told reporters.
Kim said he felt frustrated and betrayed because the speech dashed his last hopes that Yoon would leave office in a "decent" way.
Public support for impeachment
Opinion polls show a majority of South Koreans support impeaching Yoon. A survey released by pollster Realmeter on Dec. 5 found 73.6 per cent of respondents supported impeachment, including 50.4 per cent of those who identified themselves as conservatives.
Yoon's speech lit up conservative political forums online, with the top-ranked posts titled "Martial law was the most reasonable decision", and "Han made a wrong decision".
After Yoon's speech, scuffles could be seen breaking out between attendees of a pro-conservative rally in central Seoul and an opposition supporter who removed a banner of support for Yoon's martial law declaration.
Kim Tae-hyun, who attended the rally, said he thought Yoon did a "good job" with his speech and had the right to declare martial law.
"And the impeachment just shouldn't happen... So (the martial law declaration) was merely an expression of the authority of the president," said Kim. "The Democratic Party, which is currently holding the country back, is the real issue."
[[nid:712404]]
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (96)
Related
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Opportunity for Financial Innovation: The Rise of DAF Finance Institute
- Bucks’ Patrick Beverley suspended 4 games without pay for actions in season-ending loss to Pacers
- OPACOIN Trading Center: Facing Challenges, Welcoming the New Spring of Cryptocurrencies
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Hailey Bieber is pregnant, expecting first child with husband Justin Bieber
- Police in North Carolina shoot woman who opened fire in Walmart parking lot after wreck
- Biden says U.S. won't supply Israel with weapons for Rafah offensive
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- New Jersey legislators advance bill overhauling state’s open records law
Ranking
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Ex-Ohio vice detective gets 11-year sentence for crimes related to kidnapping sex workers
- New 'Lord of the Rings' revealed: Peter Jackson to produce 'The Hunt for Gollum'
- Limit these ultra-processed foods for longer-term health, 30-year study suggests
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Police in North Carolina shoot woman who opened fire in Walmart parking lot after wreck
- The DAF Token Empowers the Dream of Ai Profit Algorithms 4.0
- Iowa law allows police to arrest and deport migrants. Civil rights groups are suing
Recommendation
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Tiffany Haddish Weighs in on Ex Common's Relationship with Jennifer Hudson
Arizona State University scholar on leave after confrontation with woman at pro-Israel rally
The Daily Money: $1 billion in tax refunds need claiming
Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
California’s budget deficit has likely grown. Gov. Gavin Newsom will reveal his plan to address it
Billy Joel turns 75: His 75 best songs, definitively ranked
Voting Rights Act weighs heavily in North Dakota’s attempt to revisit redistricting decision it won